Wisconsin Update
Recall Momentum!
Dane County Executive
Kathleen Falk has
recently added the Wisconsin AFL-CIO to her list of endorsees including: AFSCME
Councils 24, 40 and 48, EMILY's List, SEIU Wisc. State Council, the Sierra Club,
Voces de la Frontera and WEAC.
The race to
replace Wisc. Gov. Scott Walker is gearing up as the Democratic candidates for
governor officially filed for the recall election today. The two leading
candidates, Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett,
have been attending town hall meetings and public forums to discuss their ideas
for the top state office and how they plan to restore collective bargaining
rights for the Badger State's public workers.
Barrett recently said that he would call a special legislative session this
summer to reverse Walker's collective bargaining decision. Falk has gone one
step further in her support for working families with her intent to include the
restoration of public sector collective bargaining in the state budget - what
she calls "a bill that has to pass." Falk's ardent support for public
sector workers' rights has recently earned her the endorsement of the Wisconsin
AFL-CIO, in addition to previous endorsements and recommendations from AFSCME
Councils 24, 40 and 48, the Wisconsin Education Association Council, EMILY's
List and others.
AFSCME, along with labor and progressive allies, are also fighting to recall
four anti-worker lawmakers from the Wisconsin State Senate. Three current and
former state lawmakers, all with a strong track record of fighting for working
families - and against Walker’s agenda - are challenging unpopular,
anti-worker senators. State Senate Co-Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald is facing
a challenge from political newcomer Lori Compas whose fierce activism will force
the senator to fight for his seat in what should be a safe district. A win in
any of these recall elections will would mean the return of a pro-worker
majority to the state senate.
In the statewide and state senate recall races, AFSCME members will continue to
fight for candidates who will restore the collective bargaining rights that are
vital to all working families.
AFSCME Wisconsin has endorsed former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk to face Gov. Scott Walker in this year's recall election. Three Democrats (Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk, and WI Secretary of State Doug La Follette and State Sen. Kathleen Vinehout) are running in the primary to beat Walker and end his right-wing war on working families. But unlike Falk, who has promised if elected governor to veto any budget bill that does not restore public worker collective bargaining, La Follette won’t promise to restore collective bargaining.
Biggest Recall in American History: More Than One Million Signatures Submitted to Recall Scott Walker: MADISON - United Wisconsin today announced that more than one million Wisconsinites have signed a petition to recall Scott Walker, representing the most-participated-in major recall effort in American history, and a number so significant that it is beyond any legal challenge. More then 845,000 signatures were collected for Rebecca Kleefisch. Signatures were submitted to the Government Accountability Board this afternoon.
The signatures represent the largest recall effort in the history of the United States and 185 percent of the signatures needed to trigger a recall of Walker.
“The collection of more than one million signatures represents a crystal clear indication of how strong the appetite is to stop the damage and turmoil that Scott Walker has caused Wisconsin,” said Ryan Lawler, board member for United Wisconsin. “Scott Walker and his supporters tried to demean and marginalize recall circulators, but in Wisconsin winter, an army of more than 30,000 Wisconsin born-and-bred recall volunteers took to street corners, malls, places of worship, dinner tables and sidewalks to take their state back.”
The total of a million signatures to recall Scott Walker represents nearly half, 46 percent, of the electorate - and is just shy of the TOTAL votes received by Walker in his 2010 election (Walker received 1.12 million votes).
In comparison, this figure surpasses the per capita participation in the effort to trigger a ballot initiative in Ohio last fall against a Republican union-busting effort, where 32 percent of the electorate signed the petition, and in America’s only other two gubernatorial recalls, in 2003 in California and in 1921 in North Dakota, the signature totals were 23.4 percent and 31.8 percent, of the electorate signed respectively. The attached charts outline these figures.
Fun facts about the recall petitions of Walker, Kleefisch and the Senate recalls include:
The weight of all of the signatures collected is 3,000 pounds. That’s two of the heaviest Wisconsin Dairy (Holstein) Cows, or 158 of the heaviest Badgers.
300,000 pages at 14" each laid end to end is 66.3 miles. This is the distance from Green Bay to Oshkosh, La Crosse to Tomah.
Stood straight up the petition pile is 128 times higher than the tallest building in the world.
Stacked on top of one another, the petitions would reach 125 feet high, which is taller than the wings of the Madison Capitol Building (those are 84 feet high).
United Wisconsin is the non-partisan grassroots organization heading up the recall efforts of Scott Walker and Rebecca Kleefisch in Wisconsin. The group plans to continue its work as the recall campaign moves forward. For more information, visit www.unitedwisconsin.com.
A full breakdown of the biggest recall in American history is available to view here. Graphic illustrations of the recall numbers are available to view here and here.
|
|
Wisconsin
Working Families Win 2 of 6 in Recall Elections!
Wisconsin working families
won two of six recall elections last week, ousting incumbent state senators who
backed Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s attacks on the collective bargaining
rights of public employees. Democrat Jessica King defeated Republican incumbent
Randy Hopper in Senate District 18 and Democrat Jennifer Shilling (D) won
over incumbent state Sen. Dan Kapanke (R) in Senate District 32. The victories
narrow the Wisconsin Republican Senate majority to one.
The districts with recalls are in largely rural areas that have consistently
elected Republicans - voters in one have not elected a Democrat since the late
1800s. Although Barack Obama carried Wisconsin by 14 points in 2008, no Democrat
won in these disticts.
Click here for a list of candidates from the Wisconsin AFL-CIO.
This past weekend, working family volunteers and community, civil rights and faith activists went door-to-door, staffed phone banks and set up information tables at popular locations in each district to get the word out about the real candidates vs. the ringers.
Republicans who earlier this year vowed to recall several Democrats were unable to gather enough signatures in all but three of their targeted districts to qualify for the ballot. Next Tuesday, primary elections will be held in two of those districts, along with a general election for the Green Bay seat of state Sen. Dave Hansen (D).
In the Green Bay election, the leading Republican candidate was disqualified from the ballot for lack of adequate signatures. So Hansen will face Republican David VanderLeest—who according to Wisconsin news media has a court record of two misdemeanor convictions, fines for multiple building code violations, an unpaid judgment, bankruptcy and a home foreclosure. (7/12/2011)
GAB Rules GOP Senate
Candidate Ineligible! (6/28/2011)
State Sen. Dave Hansen's upcoming recall election got some positive news
yesterday when a challenge filed by a concerned citizen got State Rep. John
Nygren (R) kicked off the July 19 primary ballot. The Government Accountability
Board ruled invalid 26 of the 424 signatures Nyrgen submitted leaving him two
signatures short of the requirement.
Wisconsin Republicans were so focused on qualifying fake Democratic challengers
in GOP-held districts, that they failed to get their own candidates qualified.
As a result, Sen. Hansen will face relative unknown David VanderLeest in a July
19 general election.
Although Governor Scott Walker's anti-worker law goes into effect tomorrow, the
administration is delaying implementation until after the recall elections are
over. "They don't want to come out with Neanderthal kinds of changes on the
workplace issues prior to the recalls," said Marty Beil, executive director
of AFSCME Council 24.
It all
seems to be part of a pattern of bad behavior by anti-worker politicians in the
face of opposition. Conservative Supreme Court Justice David Prosser has
recently been accused of choking one of his female colleagues during debate over
the challenge to the new law. The Dane County Sheriff's office has opened an
investigation into claims made by Justice Ann Walsh Bradley that Prosser tried
to choke her during a heated argument.
As our opponents continue to make their own efforts more difficult, AFSCME
members and our allies are out working hard and talking to voters in the nine
state Senate districts to ensure that the upcoming elections are successful.
The 4-3
party-line vote ruling brought a vow from the state AFL-CIO that it will
continue the fight against the Right – but at the ballot box, starting
with July 12 recall elections against six Republican state senators who
helped ram Walker’s law through.
"The inability of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to separate partisan
politics from the well-being of Wisconsinites is the latest indication
that citizens do not have a voice in this state,” said state fed
President Phil Neuenfeldt. “The only way for Wisconsinites to repair
that voice is to take back the Senate this summer, stop Walker's
unbridled assault on working people and take back the statehouse in
2012.”
Walker shoved the anti-union bill through the state senate, which is
19-14 Republican, after the Democrats initially halted it by decamping
from the state, preventing a quorum on what Walker had called a budget
bill. Amid massive uproar and tens of thousands of protesters on the
Capitol grounds, Walker and the GOP then deleted the budget provisions
and the remaining GOP senators approved it, 18-1.
Walker’s law made Wisconsin the leading front in the state-by-state
war on workers and the middle class being waged by Republicans, big
business and the Radical Right. Support for Wisconsin workers was
galvanized worldwide – even among Egyptian revolutionaries – and up
to 100,000 descended upon the state capitol building in Madison. Some
are still there in a tent city, “Walkerville.”
But Dane County (Madison) Circuit Court Judge Maryanne Sumi, a GOP
appointee, halted Walker’s law by ruling its passage violated the
state Open Meetings Act. The state Supreme Court overturned her
injunction, reinstating Walker’s law.
"Let's be clear: This ruling will not silence the voices of
millions of Wisconsinites who are appalled by Walker's extreme choices,
his addiction to corporate interests and his insistence on putting the
wealthy ahead of the working. In their attempt to steamroll education,
healthcare, and funding for seniors programs, Republicans have alienated
countless Wisconsin families,” Neuenfeldt continued.
“Now, more than ever, Wisconsinites across the state are committed to
holding Republicans accountable for their bad choices.
"This ruling is an affront to our democracy. Green-lighting the
sort of shady, backroom tactics Walker used to ram his extreme budget
through the legislature sets a dangerous precedent for the future of our
state. Democracy is the system by which all people, not just
corporations and the wealthy, have a seat at the table – but this
ruling is just one more indication that Wisconsin Republicans do not
believe in a functioning, sound democracy inclusive of checks and
balances," Neuenfeldt ended.
The majority ruling in the case mentioned none of that.
“One of the courts that we are charged with supervising has usurped
the legislative power which the Wisconsin Constitution grants
exclusively to the legislature,” the majority wrote.
“It is important for all courts to remember that Article IV, Section 1
of the Wisconsin Constitution provides: ‘The legislative power shall
be vested in a senate and assembly.’ Article IV, Section 17…provides
in relevant part: ‘No law shall be in force until published. The
legislature shall provide by law for the speedy publication of all
laws,’” the majority’s opinion said.
In a 1943 case, the justices added, their court “addressed whether a
court has the power to enjoin publication of a bill duly enacted by the
legislature…The court then explained that the “judicial department
has no jurisdiction or right to interfere with the legislative process.
That is something committed by the constitution entirely to the
legislature itself.”
The court held that “because under our system of constitutional
government, no one of the co-ordinate departments can interfere with the
discharge of the constitutional duties of one of the other departments,
no court has jurisdiction to enjoin the legislative process at any
point.”
Adding insult to the decision, Justice Scott Prosser – a Walker ally
who is leading in a disputed election for the court’s swing 7th seat
– told the unions and their allies not to bother challenging
Walker’s law after its reinstatement. Prosser was one of the
four-justice majority ruling for Walker.
“Attacking the constitutionality of an act after it has been published
is quite different from attacking its validity before it becomes law.
This must be acknowledged. Nonetheless, no useful purpose would be
served by inviting a new series of challenges to 2011 Wisconsin Act 10
after publication of the act has been completed,” Prosser wrote in a
separate concurring opinion.
The justices then tossed out Judge Sumi’s injunction, which had
prevented publication of Walker’s law – and barred it from taking
effect.
By Mark Gruenberg, PAI Staff Writer Press Associates, Inc.
In Wisconsin, A recall of Historic Proportions!Wisconsin voters are on the verge of making history, with a recall vote of epic proportions, never seen in this country before. Organizers targeted every one of the 16 eligible senators (meaning they’ve been in office for at least one year) — eight Democratic and eight Republican — for their votes and behavior pertaining to Act 10, also known as the budget repair bill.
Republicans are targeted for their votes in favor of Act 10, which would restrict collective bargaining rights among public employees, as well as a perceived subversion of the democratic process with a hasty committee vote on an altered form of the bill; Democrats are on the block for opposing Gov. Walker’s reforms or their 3-week flight to Illinois to stall the vote. Full Story
All the petitions have carried far more signatures than the minimum needed to qualify, which must equal 25 percent of the total vote for governor in November’s election in each Senate district. The Cowles petition needed just 15,960 signatures and the 26,524 represents 166 percent of the requirement.
Along with Cowles, recall petitions have been filed for Alberta Darling of River Hills, Shelia Harsdof of River Falls, Luther Olsen of Ripon, Dan Kapanke of La Crosse and Randy Hopper of Fond du Lac. Democrats need to win three seats to take control of the Senate.
Republicans targeted eight Democratic senators for recall, but filed petitions for just three and those have yet to be verified. They fell short and missed the deadline for four others. They still have a few days to file against their last target.
More Recall Petitions Filed
Against Wisconsin Senators! Volunteer signature gatherers
in Wisconsin have now surpassed the achievements of all of the other recall
petition circulators in state history. Until this year, there were only ever
four successful efforts get recall elections on the ballot in Wisconsin.
Activists just filed their fifth recall petition in three weeks against the
eight GOP state senators who voted last month to strip public service workers of
their rights. Here's a run down of the numbers behind this remarkable
achievement:
On April 1, LaCrosse area volunteers filed a recall petition with 21,700
signatures against Senator Dan Kapanke *
On April 7, Fond du Lac area volunteers filed a recall petition with 22,500
signatures against Senator Randy Hopper*
On April 18, Ripon area volunteers filed a recall petition with 24,000
signatures against Senator Luther Olsen *
On April 19, River Falls area volunteers filed a recall petition with 23,000
signatures against Senator Sheila Harsdorf
On April 21, volunteers filed a recall petition with more than 30,000 signatures
against Senator Alberta Darling
While anti-worker groups also claimed to be poised today to file recall
petitions against three of the Democratic state senators who stood up for
workers' rights, their signature gathering efforts have not been going as well.
The clock runs out next week and some observers say that they may not have
enough valid signatures in all three of the Democratic districts.
No matter how many recall elections end up taking place, AFSCME activists in
Wisconsin will now turn their attention to winning the series elections that
should be taking place over the next few months as part of an effort to take
back the Wisconsin State Senate from the anti-worker politicians who control it
now.
The debate over whether Walker campaigned on that plan has been central to the Wisconsin battle since it began, and it remains significant now that the drive to recall Wisconsin Repubicans is under way. Labor and Dems have argued that their reaction to Walker’s proposal — from the Dems’ fleeing of the state to the decision to initiate the recall drives — has been justified by the fact that Walker never leveled with voters about his truly radical intentions.
The claim that Walker campaigned on the proposal has also been central to Walker’s defense of himself throughout the whole fight, and has been widely repeated by many Republicans and conservatives defending the Governor.
But today, Dem Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia sharply questioned Walker on the matter, and finally got him to concede that he didn’t in fact campaign directly on the proposal.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker
Heads to D.C. to Spread Attack on Workers!
Not content with the
full-scale attack on workers' rights he has launched in his home state,
Governor
Scott Walker is heading to Capitol Hill
on April 14th to share some of his ideas with the members of the House Oversight
and Government Reform Committee. Chairman Darryl Issa (R-CA) has titled the
hearing "State and Municipal Debt: Tough Choices Ahead." This is the
third in a series of hearings seeking to link public employee compensation and
pensions to state and local budget problems.
As the Battleground Bulletin has reported previously, this has been a hard case
for Issa to make nationally simply because it is not true. This makes Walker a
strange choice as a witness, because facts in Wisconsin are even more stark. The
only demonstrable link between Walker's attack on workers and the budget
problems the state and municipalities may be facing is that the governor's tax
cuts for businesses have only made the problem worse. In fact, Wisconsin has one
of the best funded pension plans in the entire country. And, Walker refused to
come to the table to negotiate with public service workers even when we agreed
in principle to his financial terms.
Walker's mission in D.C. is clear. He wants to grab a little bit more of the
national spotlight and get some kudos from the members of Congress who support
his radical, anti-worker agenda. We are quite sure that the pro-worker members
of the committee are prepared to force Gov. Walker to answer the tough questions
about his true agenda and the driving forces behind his attack on workers.
Another Victory! The first election in Wisconsin since the state passed anti-union legislation is bad news for Governor Scott Walker: Democrat JoAnne Kloppenburg has a tiny edge over Republican Supreme Court Justice David Prosser - just 204 votes, which means the race is likely headed for a recount. If Kloppenburg pulls of a victory - which she already declared m- Democrats would hold a 4-3 advantage on the court if and when the anti-union law ends up before it. Prosser had seemed poised for easy reelection until Walker's battle against Senate Democrats over the legislation, which strips public workers of collective-bargaining rights.
"Apparently that language was either misunderstood or ignored, but what I said was the further implementation of (the law) was enjoined," said a visibly annoyed Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi. "That is what I now want to make crystal clear."
Earlier this month, Sumi issued an emergency injunction prohibiting the Wisconsin secretary of state from formally publishing the law -- the final step before it could take effect.
Republican legislative leaders responded by directing the law be published by another state agency, and then declared it valid. State officials began implementing the law this weekend, stopping the collection of union dues for state workers and taking more from their pay for health care and retirement.
Sumi said Tuesday that action violated her original order, and she made it clear after a daylong hearing that the law was on hold while she considers a broader challenge to its legality.
The back and forth furthered the often angry debate between new Gov. Scott Walker, his Republican allies in the Legislature and the state's public sector unions.
Wisconsin Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch, Walker's top aide, issued a statement saying the agency will evaluate the judge's order.
Wisconsin Judge Halts Anti-worker Law! A Wisconsin judge has issued a temporary restraining order blocking the implementation of the bill that strips many public employees of their voice on the job.The bill has elicited huge protests in the Badger State, including another massive rally over the weekend. Citing a violation of the state’s open meeting law, Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi Friday issued the order, which blocks implementation of the law signed by Governor Scott Walker March 11.Wisconsin judge halts anti-worker law (3/20/2011): A Wisconsin judge has issued a temporary restraining order blocking the implementation of the bill that strips many public employees of their voice on the job. Full Story
Public Sector Collective Bargaining Has A Proud History! ~ Labor Studies Professor Paul F. Clark (3/6/2011) The fight in Wisconsin has focused the nation's attention on collective bargaining and its role in a democratic society. Other states facing fiscal crises are watching the battle there. Unfortunately, because of the highly partisan nature of the fight in Wisconsin, the debate has shed more heat than light. The modern system of collective bargaining was developed during the 1930s to address the imbalance of power between employers and employees. The Wagner Act, passed in 1935, created a system of collective bargaining which leveled the playing field and provided a structure that reduced labor strife and unrest. This law gave most workers in the private sector the right to form unions, bargain and strike. Full Story